Saluto all'Iftar con gli ambasciatori dell'Organizzazione della Conferenza Islamica





• A tutti voi rivolgo un caloroso augurio di “Ramadan Mubarak” (tipica espressione di augurio pronunciata in tempo di Ramadan con il significato letterale di “Ramadan benedetto”).

• Sono lieto di rinnovare questa sera il nostro incontro dell’Iftar, che rappresenta una testimonianza di vicinanza a voi ed alle comunità dei vostri Paesi in Italia. Questo evento si inserisce nel solco di una tradizione di rispetto e dialogo che ha permeato per secoli i rapporti fra i nostri popoli, contribuendo ad arricchire le nostre reciproche culture. Sono convinto del fatto che il dialogo sia il metodo imprescindibile per un’efficace governance internazionale, esigendo una reale apertura nel rispetto e nella comprensione della differenza e della specificità dell'altro.

• La data prescelta per il nostro incontro è quanto mai opportuna in quanto coincide con il giorno dell’avvio dei negoziati diretti tra Israele e l’Autorità nazionale Palestinese. Il nostro vivo auspicio è il raggiungimento dell’obiettivo di una pace duratura, il cui elemento centrale sarà rappresentato dalla coesistenza di due Stati: uno Stato Palestinese indipendente, democratico, contiguo e vitale, che viva accanto allo Stato di Israele, secondo una soluzione concordata nel negoziato che assicuri pace e sicurezza per tutti.

• Ritengo opportuno riconoscere i meriti dell’Amministrazione americana, che ha investito significative risorse in vista di questo fondamentale traguardo politico. Credo altresì corretto valorizzare la coesione dimostrata dalla comunità internazionale attraverso l’azione del Quartetto e soprattutto grazie alle scelte lungimiranti dei Paesi arabi, che hanno riconfermato l’importanza di un loro contributo basato sull’Iniziativa di Pace della Lega Araba. Il ruolo dell’Unione Europea in questo difficile passaggio è stato quello di condividere le responsabilità negoziali e finanziarie, muovendosi in modo sinergico con gli Stati Uniti.

• In questo quadro, anche l’Italia si è impegnata attivamente e con continuità per conseguire questo importante obiettivo. Il Presidente Berlusconi ha più volte veicolato messaggi a favore della ripresa dei negoziati diretti al Primo Ministro Netanyahu, al Presidente Abbas ed agli altri “leader” regionali, reiterando la disponibilità ad ospitare i colloqui di pace ad Erice. Per parte mia, ho in programma insieme ad alcuni colleghi dell’Unione Europea una missione in Israele ed in Palestina con il compito di facilitare, ove se ne presentasse la necessità, il prosieguo dei negoziati di pace. L’Unione Europea e l’Italia non intendono limitare il loro ruolo a quello pur fondamentale di “finanziatore”, essendo entrambe pronte ad offrire i contributi concreti che i palestinesi, gli arabi, gli israeliani e la comunità internazionale si attendono.

• Affinché l’obiettivo sia raggiunto è tuttavia indispensabile che iniziative parallele di rafforzamento della fiducia reciproca siano contemporaneamente adottate dalla comunità internazionale. Serve infatti la cooperazione e la responsabilità di tutti gli attori coinvolti affinché il negoziato possa concludersi con successo. Si tratta di uno sforzo notevole, al quale anche l’Organizzazione della Conferenza Islamica, la Lega araba ed i loro Paesi membri sono chiamati a partecipare al fine di trasmettere ad israeliani e palestinesi i sentimenti di speranza con i quali il mondo intero guarda al prosieguo dei negoziati. Dobbiamo creare insieme una diffusa rete di sostegno diplomatico essenziale a salvaguardare il buon esito dei colloqui. Dobbiamo altresì esortare entrambe le parti a fare il possibile per giungere ad un accordo, avendo ben presenti le conseguenze negative che provocherebbe un malaugurato fallimento negoziale.

• Auspichiamo pertanto progressi sostanziali nei negoziati per giungere a un accordo in 12 mesi e, a tal fine, riteniamo necessaria un’estensione della moratoria sulle costruzioni negli insediamenti israeliani in Cisgiordania, a favore della quale continueremo a premere nei prossimi giorni. E’ altresì importante che il percorso negoziale sia accompagnato da gesti significativi, paralleli e simultanei, da parte del mondo arabo che rassicurino Israele sulla solidità del cammino intrapreso. È d’altra parte altresì importante che i Paesi musulmani intensifichino i loro sforzi a sostegno del Presidente Abbas sul piano finanziario e su quello politico, rafforzando il riconoscimento internazionale dell’azione di “institution building” attuata con il Piano Fayyad.

Questo Iftar si svolge inoltre in prossimità della mia partenza per New York in occasione dell’Assemblea generale delle Nazioni Unite. Mi sembra quindi opportuno ricordare che in tale sessione l’Italia intende riproporre, insieme agli altri Paesi dell’Unione Europea, una risoluzione sull’intolleranza religiosa affinché siano tutelate le comunità religiose nel mondo. Ci attendiamo anche di giungere alla presentazione di un’iniziativa volta a contrastare l’odioso fenomeno delle Mutilazioni Genitali Femminili, diffuse anche in Paesi ricettori di immigrazione come il nostro. Si tratta di una conferma del fatto che si possa universalmente convergere sul principio secondo cui la religione non può essere invocata a sproposito e strumentalizzata per dare copertura a usi tradizionali contrari ai diritti umani. In virtù di questo principio, l’Italia ha avviato un’azione internazionale ad ampio raggio, scegliendo la strada del coinvolgimento e della sensibilizzazione dei Paesi dove maggiore è l’incidenza di questa pratica.

• L’iniziativa poggia sulla consapevolezza che vi sono valori universali, in quanto radicati nella natura della persona. Il riconoscimento della dignità inalienabile dell’essere umano, il rispetto della vita e del corpo umano, la ricerca del bene sono alcuni di essi. Valori condivisi da cristiani, musulmani e da tutti coloro i quali pregano ed agiscono con il cuore, sapendo farsi solidale con chi ha bisogno. Protesa com’è nel Mediterraneo, l’Italia ha del resto sviluppato nei secoli una tradizione di apertura e sintonia con i vicini popoli di religione islamica. Mutua comprensione alla quale indirizza anche il precetto del Corano che esorta popoli e tribù a conoscersi a vicenda (Sura 49 versetto 13). Tali premesse mi portano a respingere la tesi di quanti sostengono che sia in atto uno scontro tra due civiltà, quella occidentale e quella musulmana. La contrapposizione è semmai tra gli uomini di buona volontà (a prescindere dal credo professato) ed i fanatici intolleranti.

• In questo contesto, vorrei ribadire il concetto che l’autentico Islam può liberamente prosperare in Italia, mentre sono banditi dal territorio italiano quanti predicano violenza ed odio, appellandosi iniquamente e surrettiziamente al nome dell’Islam. D’altro canto, in virtù di una condizione di reciprocità aperta, ci attendiamo anche da parte vostra un approccio di tolleranza nei confronti delle minoranze religiose. Mi compiaccio vivamente dell’atteggiamento di quei Governi che assicurano un’efficace tutela del pluralismo religioso, seppur adattata agli specifici modelli di convivenza; dall’altro lato, chiedo di porre fine alle odiose discriminazioni che tuttora registriamo in altre parti del mondo. In quest’ottica, apprezzo i notevoli sforzi dall’Organizzazione per la Conferenza Islamica per promuovere l’immagine del vero Islam e per sostenere la solidarietà ed il dialogo tra i popoli.

• E’ anche dovere della politica garantire la fondamentale libertà religiosa. Essa contempla tanto le libertà più intime riferite ai propri pensieri e convinzioni, quanto la facoltà di manifestarli in privato e in pubblico. La professione di fede non è solo un fatto privato, ma implica anche un atto pubblico di tutela del diritto, come abbiamo voluto ribadire interponendo appello contro la sentenza della Corte di Strasburgo che vieta l’esposizione del crocifisso nelle aule scolastiche. Ci opponiamo infatti alla percezione della dimensione religiosa come esclusivo fattore di divisione, che secondo alcuni andrebbe neutralizzata, se non rimossa dallo spazio pubblico. Temi questi, sui quali nei giorni scorsi ho avuto modo di elaborare in modo articolato a Rimini alla presenza di autorevoli rappresentanti di Nigeria, Senegal, Turchia e Pakistan.

• Per parte nostra, riconfermiamo continuamente con fatti concreti la nostra volontà di interagire efficacemente e su basi paritarie con i Paesi musulmani. Abbiamo ad esempio rinnovato il nostro sostegno al negoziato di adesione della Turchia all’Unione Europea. Abbiamo inoltre agito a difesa della pace ed a sostegno della ricostruzione della società civile in vari Paesi di religione musulmana: in Kosovo, Libano, Somalia, Iraq ed Afghanistan per citare solo i casi più significativi. La nostra presenza in queste aree è sempre improntata all’ascolto delle esigenze ed all’assistenza delle comunità e delle autorità locali. I vili attentati terroristici, come quello di Mogadiscio di pochi giorni fa, ci impongono peraltro di non abbassare la guardia nella costruzione di un futuro di pace per questi Paesi.

• Abbiamo inoltre dato riprova di solidarietà alle popolazioni musulmane, intervenendo prontamente e con rilevanti contributi in favore del Pakistan devastato dalle alluvioni. Poiché sono convinto del fatto che non basti fare del bene, ma che occorra anche farlo bene, nei giorni scorsi ho proposto ai colleghi europei di rafforzare le iniziative umanitarie con nuove misure finalizzate a favorire la crescita economica del Paese e la sua piena integrazione con quella internazionale. Nel novero delle numerose iniziative intraprese dal Governo italiano ed a testimonianza dell’attenzione riservata alle sensibilità musulmane, vorrei ricordare anche il progetto “Halal Italia” diretto alla creazione di un marchio di qualità “halal” per il deferente accesso di prodotti italiani ai settori dell’alimentare, della cosmetica e della farmaceutica dei mercati dei Paesi islamici.

• Teniamo inoltre a sviluppare rapporti politici privilegiati con tutti i Paesi qui oggi rappresentati, mirando anche a rafforzare i diversi equilibri regionali. Sul piano multilaterale siamo in particolare interessati ad approfondire la collaborazione con la Lega Araba con iniziative concrete da sviluppare nel quadro di un Memorandum d’Intesa. Il difficile cammino dell’Unione per il Mediterraneo, che riflette una visione ambiziosa e “unitaria” della regione mediterranea, non deve farci trascurare l’importanza strategica del rilancio delle politiche euro-mediterranee. Auspico in tal senso che il Vertice UpM possa svolgersi nel prossimo mese di novembre. Ritengo che si debbano anche cogliere i positivi segnali di collaborazione che emergono a livello sub-regionale nel Mediterraneo occidentale con il Dialogo 5+5, di cui abbiamo assunto la co-Presidenza del “volet” Esteri ed al quale intendiamo imprimere nuovo impulso. Desidero anche ribadire il nostro convinto appoggio all’Alleanza delle Civiltà, strumento capace di sostenere il dialogo interculturale e interreligioso.

• L’insieme di queste diverse ed importanti iniziative riflette il profondo riguardo dell’Italia e del suo popolo nei confronti della millenaria cultura islamica. Un rispetto che affonda le radici nella nostra Storia. Fin dal felice periodo in cui in Sicilia convivevano nel reciproco rispetto per le diverse fedi e tradizioni le comunità latina, greco-bizantina, ebraica ed araba (periodo normanno intorno al 1100). I legati della civiltà islamica, riconoscibili in alcuni tratti del nostro patrimonio artistico, ci ricordano che il dialogo tra popoli e religioni è il miglior strumento di diplomazia preventiva, oltre che impulso al mutuo arricchimento spirituale e culturale. La società italiana è tuttora aperta, ma anche allerta: in grado di accogliere chi professa una fede diversa da quella della maggioranza, ma nel contempo vigile ed attenta a richiedere l’osservanza da parte degli immigrati dei propri principi e valori fondamentali.

• Concludo con una promessa ed un auspicio. L’anno prossimo ripeteremo l’Iftar, che è ormai diventato una consueta tradizione di dialogo tra amici nel rispetto delle diverse fedi religiose. Mi auguro comunque di rivederci prima anche perché, come ha osservato il Santo Padre Benedetto XVI in un incontro con i rappresentanti delle comunità musulmane, il dialogo religioso e interculturale fra cristiani e musulmani non può ridursi a una scelta stagionale. Esso è una necessità vitale, da cui dipende in gran parte il nostro futuro.

2.9.10 | Posted in , | Continua »

Lectio del ministro Frattini all’Università di Washington



Immigration and the rights of immigrant workers

University of Washington
31 August 2010

Migration is a global challenge that requires an active approach.
Throughout human history, migration has been a courageous expression of the individual’s will to overcome adversity and to live a better life. Yet I believe that we need to change –if not completely – our traditional way of thinking about migration as a world of loss and sorrow. In Italy, in particular, we have been holding an open debate on immigration for years now. This is most likely because our country’s history has traditionally been linked to the phenomenon of emigration and it is only fairly recently that we have had to face immigration issues. For a long time we have seen immigration essentially as a tragic phenomenon that involved the world’s poorest people. We felt morally obliged to provide assistance and support to these people once they had reached terra incognita, regardless of any evaluation of whether they had respected the legal migration procedures or of the social impact of their influx.

I believe that, without betraying our traditions, we need to shift from a somewhat passive approach, where we see immigration solely in terms of poverty and distress, to a positive approach, where we see inward migration in terms of an ultimately enriching experience. We can only make this shift if we adopt an active and comprehensive approach to migration in order to respond to this global challenge.

International migration is an inescapable and vast phenomenon.
According to the UN, there are more than 200 million migrant workers throughout the world, 31 million of whom legally reside in the territory of the European Union. Migrants legally residing in Italy
(about 4 million people) now account for 7.1% of the population. These figures are too large to warrant a passive or individualistic approach: a single state cannot cope with such onerous figures.
This is particularly true in the European Union, where we have created an area that envisages the free movement of people. And it is especially true in Italy, given our geographical location as a bridge between two continents.
When migrants land on the shores of Sicily they can easily move on: to Austria, say, and then to Germany and the Netherlands. The issue does not stop at Italy’s borders: it becomes European.
Of course, this does not mean that we want to unload our problems onto Brussels or onto our other partners.
It just means that, whereas a common response would enable us to grasp the great potential benefits of migration, any one state, left alone, could be submerged by it. In other words, we need to develop an active, common approach.

Migration requires us to have a political debate
Today, more than ever, a national and passive attitude towards immigration is not consistent with the fact that this phenomenon has become one of the most complex issues in international politics

Immigration is a subject that divides public opinion, and one of the most visible challenges posed by globalisation.
However, it would be unrealistic to avoid holding the crucial debate on this matter or to overlook the much-needed solutions just because it is a divisive topic. Actually, if well managed, migration is one area where our citizens will clearly see the added value of a proactive response

Migration enriches both countries of origin and destination countries
We need to look at migration as an enrichment of today's world, not as a threat. Indeed, both countries of origin and destination countries largely profit from migration

(1) In destination countries, migrant workers contribute to economic growth by meeting the demand for workers, increasing the demand for goods and services and developing their entrepreneurial skills.
The United States is the best historical example of how a great nation can be built upon immigration. Italians were not only appreciated for their diligence as workers but were also given a chance to be integrated in American society and to expand and enrich American civilization. In the US the flows of migrant workers have successfully continued ever since. They have recently made valuable contributions to the expansion of information technology industries. Silicon Valley would not be what it is today without the enormous role played by clever and enterprising immigrants, foreign-born scientists and engineers.
In Italy, around 8% of our national GDP can be attributed to migrant workers

Moreover, labour and skills shortages are already noticeable in a number of sectors – and are likely to increase. At the same time, Italy’s indigenous population is set to decline in the next few decades, making immigration the main ingredient for demographic growth. The long-term sustainability of our welfare system largely depends, therefore, on the permanent employment of migrants.

(2) Countries of origin also receive significant gains from migration
.Migrant workers contribute to their countries’ development by alleviating pressures on labour markets, sending remittances home, acquiring new and improved skills, and making investments – all of which help to reduce poverty.
Remittances provide the most tangible link between migration and development: a relationship that has gained importance since the economic crisis. In fact, remittances are proving to be one of the more resilient elements of the global economy during the current downturn, and are likely to play a large and important role in the recovery of many developing countries. To ensure that these funds move easily and efficiently around the globe, governments should attempt to make remittances as cheap and accessible as possible.

That is why, under the Italian G8 Presidency, the G8 leaders approved an initiative to halve the average transaction costs for migrant remittances.
Today, a growing number of skilled immigrants return to their home countries
Even those who stay in their host countries often become part of transnational communities that link those countries to the economies of distant lands. Migrants’ long-distance networks enhance opportunities for entrepreneurship, investment, and trade, in both their countries of origin and of destination.

Integration is the answer to immigration
Integration is the best tool to enable us to seize the many and diverse benefits of migration. Legal migrant workers are a crucial component of the competitiveness of both their home and destination countries, but it will not be possible to realise their full potential unless they are given opportunities to integrate into their host society.
For this reason, legal migration and integration are inseparable and should mutually reinforce each other.

Integration can only be achieved by protecting the rights of legal migrant workers and tackling illegal immigration. These are two sides of the same coin.
It cannot be emphasised enough that, unless effective measures are taken to combat illegal immigration, the credibility of the legal immigration policy we are working together to shape will be irreparably undermined.

That is why it is in the interests of destination countries to pursue integration between migrant and resident workers, by preventing illegal immigration. Migrants without the right of residence are unable to access the benefits of migration, as their irregular status excludes them from labour and social rights.
That is why we actively participate at EU level in developing partnerships with third countries. These consist of mobility packages designed to better manage migration flows and, in particular, to fight illegal migration, in exchange for enhanced possibilities of access to the EU in the form of legal migration opportunities.

That is why we have strongly supported the establishment of the European Asylum Support Office, which will play a crucial role in improving the implementation of the Common European Asylum System.

That is why we have supported the Stockholm Programme, which gives us appropriate guidelines on how to better promote legal migration and achieve closer integration. We also support the idea of an EU Immigration Code, as indicated in the Programme.
This approach calls for concerted efforts from countries of origin, transit and destination, and for linkages between security and development policies. However, these policies can be successful only if migrants enjoy legal status and have the wherewithal for a decent existence.

Migrant workers’ rights
Unfortunately, there are still employers who are surprised to find, when they consider hiring migrant workers, that they are dealing with human beings. It should be stressed that as far as fundamental rights are concerned, we are absolutely steadfast in not accepting any compromise.
We cannot tolerate any violation of human rights, the protection of which has been the guiding principle of Italian foreign policy.

Italy remains respectful of migrant workers, shunning mere economic exploitation and, instead, placing human dignity at the centre of its endeavours. Italian law guarantees legal migrant workers the same rights as Italian workers, without requiring any condition of reciprocity.

Therefore, legal migrant workers are entitled to the fundamental workers’ rights, such as the human right to freedom from discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, sex or religion. They are entitled to equality before the law and equal protection by the law, to safe and healthy working conditions, and reasonable working hours. We must ensure that migrant workers are not paid lower wages than national workers for the same work, and that they are paid all the wages due to them.
As regards retirement pensions, non-EU migrant workers enjoy rights that are not even granted to Italian citizens

They can apply for a pension once they are 65 years old, regardless of any reciprocity agreement with their country of origin. They are not required to have a minimum number of contribution years (a requirement that does apply to Italian workers).
Moreover, protecting the rights of migrant workers provides an additional benefit to destination countries by preventing the development of an unprotected underclass of migrant workers

Restricting migrants’ rights may, on the contrary, generate significant social costs, especially if the restrictions are long-term and lead to the emergence of a large group of second-class residents.

Co-operation with countries of origin and transit to tackle illegal migration
Measures to combat illegal immigration should be implemented at the beginning of the migration chain. Such measures consist of more open international trade of goods and services; the promotion of peace, political stability, human rights and democratic principles; and the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of the countries of origin. We are all aware, though, that these noble goals are not always easy to achieve.

Therefore, in the fight against illegal immigration it is also extremely important to be able to rely on the cooperation of the countries of origin and of transit. Examples of such cooperation are our long-standing collaboration with Mediterranean countries such as Egypt and Algeria and the more recent agreements signed by the Italian government with countries such as Libya, Nigeria, Niger, Ghana, Gambia and Senegal.

Thanks to the implementation of these agreements, especially those with Libya, the inflow of illegal workers has been significantly reduced (in the first quarter of this year fewer than 150 illegal migrants reached Italy’s shores, while in the same period of 2009 the figures were thirty times higher!).
At the same time, we have intensified our investigative efforts in order to apprehend those responsible for smuggling and trafficking human beings. We have also set up toll-free telephone hotlines to make it possible to report cases of trafficking immediately and to help the victims of the criminal organisations involved.

Moreover, those employers who prefer to hire migrant workers without regard to the law must be harshly punished because we cannot tolerate any form of human exploitation. Nor can we accept unfair competition against those honest entrepreneurs who do abide by the law. For this reason, we have introduced harsher sanctions for those who employ illegal migrants and for landlords who lease to illegal residents.

In this context, I would also like to mention the EU directive on common standards and procedures forreturning illegally staying third country nationals

It allows us to organize the return of illegal migrants by establishing common standards guaranteeing thatthey are returned with full respect for their dignity and human rights. Joint return operations constitute also an important tool for the efficient implementation of the return policy of the Union in full respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the person subject to removal. These are key meansof establishing our credibility and seriousness in the fight against human trafficking and exploitation of illegal migrants. In the fight, I would add, against “21st century slavery”.

The role of information is fundamental
The best line of protection for migrants before they leave home is to create a migration channel for workers that is fair, open, transparent and legal
. And we can do this by providing realistic and accurate information.
Potential migrant workers should be adequately trained before leaving their home countries to allow them a greater chance of being integrated in their destination societies. They should be thoroughly informed about the risks posed by unscrupulous recruiters, traffickers in human beings and the dangers of migrating under irregular conditions.

To provide more and better information for potential migrant workers and to better train them in the lead-up to their arrival to Italy, the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has financed overseas projects
aimed at protecting children from the dangers of illegal migration (“SALEM – Solidarité Avec les Enfants du Maroc”) and training potential migrants (“Migration and return. Resources for development”). Together with Libya and Morocco, we have implemented a project (“Prometeo”) designed to prevent the trafficking of human beings across the Mediterranean Sea. A similar project has been financed in Egypt by the Ministry of Labour. The latter has also funded projects in a “circular migration” context. This scheme provides training in Italy for people from certain countries of origin, such as Moldova, the aim being for them to put their learned skills to good use on their return home. Training courses on specific sectors of our domestic legislation are financed by the Ministry of Interior to the benefit of Chinese entrepreneurs based in Italy.

We have also introduced priority channels in the processing of employment-based visas and permits for migrants who have attended training courses.

An Italian model of integration
As F.D. Roosevelt said: “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”. Unreasonable, unjustified fear sometimes paralyzes us and prevents us from making the efforts needed to convert constructive ideas and proposals into advanced rules and models.
A spirit of alarm may be spread by those people who see migration merely through the magnifying glass of security concerns (which cannot, of course, be ignored). They fail to grasp the benefits that the other side of the medal may generate: integration achieved through better governance of the migration process

However, if we want to succeed with our integration policy, we cannot merely pay lip service to the principles of responsibility and the rule of law
. We need to recognise the importance of effectively implementing these principles, by requiring migrant workers to abide by the law and to fulfil the basic principles of the society they live in – just as we do ourselves.
In other words, we have to combine our traditional welcoming spirit with the firmness needed to safeguard the respect for legality, for our fundamental values and for our civilisation
. In this way, we can develop an Italian model of integration that adequately addresses the various challenges posed by migration.

A new mindset to tackle immigration
As a first step towards a new model of integration, we need to allay people’s fears and prejudices about legal immigration while tackling the phenomenon of illegal immigration
These are, as I have said, two sides of the same coin.

Integration itself is a two way process
Legal migrants must see their rights recognised and their duties assigned. As a matter of fact, the acquisition of rights goes hand in hand with the acceptance of duties. If migrants want to be fully integrated in our societies they have to abide by the law, learn the local language and respect our values such as human rights, women's rights and even the duty to send children to school. They should also get acquainted with both our traditions and cultural heritage. In other words, legal migrants should not only restrain themselves from pursuing aggressive strategies against the fundamental values of the destination country but they also have to acquire the necessary cultural and social means in order to actively interact with local people. This is the only way to be involved in the society they live in and to share its goals. I believe that we can succeed in our integration policies only if we manage to reconcile the recognition for the rights of the legal migrants with the respect for the social order and values of the host country.

In the case of illegal migrants, the principles that must inspire our actions are the following:
(1)
We must always bear in mind that the life and dignity of human beings is at stake. The utmost respect, therefore, for migrants’ fundamental rights is essential. Any refoulement, or return, of illegal immigrants must take place with due respect for this principle and for the European rules.
(2)
We must continue to take in true refugees, i.e. those fleeing from war and persecution. However, we must ask that they be redistributed among the EU member states, initially on a voluntary, and eventually on an obligatory, basis.
(3)
We must be as rigorous as possible in hunting down and punishing the criminals behind the trafficking in human beings, the true slave-traders of the 21st century, and in tightening up controls at our external borders.
(4)
We must work on cooperation with transit countries and on the prevention of illegal immigration by fostering economic development in immigrants’ countries of origin, as Italy has done by making Africa one of the priorities of its G8 Presidency.

Facilitating the arrival of skilled workers
On the face of the international economic downturn, it is still in our interest to lure the best human capital. All skills levels are needed, but the real challenge is to attract the workers needed to fill specific gaps.
I believe that it would be a win-win solution to adopt initiatives to attract skilled workers such as a fast-track procedure for the admission of highly qualified workers, potential investors and students

With this goal in mind, the EU has adopted a new scheme, the so-called “blue card”, which I had proposed in my previous position. The “blue card” aims to make Europe a magnet for highly-skilled migrants by facilitating conditions of entry to the EU.

Concerns that skilled immigrants displace native workers need to be weighed against the fact that foreign-born engineers, for example, may start new businesses and generate jobs and wealth. Moreover, many of the migrants who stay in their destination countries are playing a growing role in linking businesses in their home countries to enterprises in Europe.

Conclusions
I have elaborated on the benefits and opportunities of migration, provided it is dealt with in a context that includes a contribution from the countries of destination, transit and origin, and as long it is guided by suitable integration policies.

I would like to conclude by stressing that:
(1) A passive and unilateral approach to migration, merely based on security issues, would be erroneous and unsuccessful.
(2) Protecting the rights of migrant workers benefits destination countries by preventing the development of an unprotected working underclass and by making it easier for migrants to integrate with their host society.
(3) Integration should not entail a denial of our founding values and principles. A multicultural approach should not allow certain cultural and religious groups to pursue aggressive strategies against our values – values such as individual rights, gender equality and respect for women.
(4) We need to protect ourselves against dangerous violations of our values and principles that could potentially destroy the fabric of our societies. But we also need to work hard to build up and pursue a positive approach to integration. We cannot neglect our traditions; nor can we overlook the fundamental rights that are such an important hallmark of our societies. For many years we unfortunately took this important heritage for granted.
(5) We need to think of integration as a process involving people who are highly motivated and who strongly desire to be part of the society they live in.
(6) In this context, pooling our efforts with those of the countries of origin and of transit makes us stronger not just when dealing with illegal migration, but also in seizing the opportunities embodied by migrants.
(7) That is why we need to adopt a comprehensive and active approach
in a framework that facilitates integration and that helps us to exploit the great benefits generated by international migration. In other words, this global issue should be addressed through global actions: a coordinated European response and inclusive contributions from both the countries of transit and those of origin.

31.8.10 | Posted in | Continua »

Aree del sito